Over the years, I’ve increasingly seen AvWeb as one of the leading websites for aviation. I have often expressed appreciation to their staff for their frequent, balanced coverage of Light-Sport aviation. Certainly if you look beyond the big member websites of EAA and AOPA, AvWeb has the biggest influence I can perceive. Recently I made some agreement to present AvWeb items of interest to Light-Sport enthusiasts and here’s one of them. *** Each week, AvWeb runs a survey and asks their 255,000 readers to weigh in on the question. Within days, 428 people had spoken their mind, and I found the results intriguing (chart). You can make up your own mind as to their meaning. *** In case the graphic doesn’t read well on your screen, here are the response choices AvWeb editors offered: (1) The FAA should butt out and honor the original rulemaking that created Light Sport/Sport Pilot; (2) There are no major safety issues, but the FAA is sending a signal; (3) Increased FAA involvement was inevitable, and we might as well welcome their input and get it over with; (4) Manufacturers have to pull up their socks and ensure all standards are met; (5) LSA standards shouldn’t be any less than full certification; and, (6) Other (My opinion doesn’t appear as a choice.) *** Those who feel Light-Sport is functioning well using industry consensus standards for certification — summing answers to points 1 & 2 — represent 56% of those responding, however, even points 3 & 4 show support for LSA producers.
Tracking What YOU Think About FAA Oversight
If necessary, make your browser window wider to see the entire chart.
Have an idea for a new "Question of the Week"? Send your suggestions to AvWeb's special email.