Zenith and Zenair are closely-linked enterprises with different leaders in different countries. In recent years, the three Heintz brothers took different responsibilities for the business founded by dad, Chris Heintz. An aeronautical engineer, Chris founded Zenair Ltd., in Canada in 1974 and parleyed his design pedigree into a flock of airplanes that have sold by the thousand all over the world. Today, Matt, Sebastien, and Michael run the multifaceted firm. Through 2015, the combined effort of Zenith and Zenair sought to produce light plane models called 750 STOL, 750 Cruzer, and 650B Zodiac plus four seat kits called CH 801/8000, a sport-utility plane, and the four-seat CH 640 plus a type-certified four seater called CH 2000. That fleet recently got a bit larger when Zenith / Zenair bought the assets from the Canadian developer of Sam LS. “Sam Aircraft assets have been acquired by the … owners and operators of Zenith Aircraft Company (U.S.) and Zenair Ltd.
Zenith Aircraft Co.
Website: http://www.zenithair.com
Email: info@zenithair.com
Phone: (573) 581-9000
Mexico, MO 65265 - USATwo Week Wonder = Wonderful Two Weeks
Your choices in the affordable aircraft range of options are composed of one of three segments that this website tracks closely: Light-Sport Aircraft (SLSA or ELSA), light kit-built aircraft, or Part 103 ultralights. In the first one, you can spend some real money with a few aircraft breaching the $200,000 barrier. Some handsome, well-equipped, high-performing aircraft are offered in that range, to be sure, but they may not fit your budget. Not all SLSA are not so expensive; some excellent candidates list for $40,000 to $125,000. If a Part 103 aircraft may suit your flying needs, you have a more choices that will get you aloft for a literal fraction of the high-end models. Alternatively, you can build your own airplane. If you choose the homebuilder route, your range of choices becomes even larger, in fact, almost infinite in that you can personalize an aircraft any way you wish and keep changing it as you like.
Viking Engine Wins STOL Competition & Customers
Engine suppliers must love Zenith Aircraft, perhaps as much as their many airframe owners. For 23 years, the kit company based in Mexico, Missouri has supplied about 200 kits per year to buyers all over the country and around the world. That is a selling performance any light airplane company would like to boast. One reason for their success is their support of a variety of engines, no small feat considering each engines has special qualities to be considered when installing and using them. Good for Zenith for going the extra mile. One of the many engines they support is the Viking Aircraft Engine from Edgewater, Florida on the Atlantic side of the Sunshine State. Zenith also supports engines from Rotax, Jabiru, UL Power, and Continental. See the video below covering the short field takeoff and landing competition on a pretty, sunny day at the Mexico airport.
Open Houses, Airshow-Built Planes, and a Birthday
Last weekend Zenith Aircraft held another of their open house events. At the Midwest LSA Expo a few weeks beforehand I asked factory pilot guru, Roger Dubbert how many people the company expected. His answer: a rather amazing “700.” According to Zenith president Sebastien Heintz it was indeed another strong event, one they’ve repeated every year since setting up shop in Mexico, Missouri. “By all accounts and measurements, the 23rd annual Hangar Day was an incredible winner,” summarized Sebastien. Among the highlights of the two-day festivities was the arrival of EAA’s two Zenith aircraft. One was an EAA staff-built version of the CH 750 Cruzer (watch for our video pilot report to be posted soon) and the second was the One Week Wonder CH 750 that was completed during AirVenture with participation from over 2,500 people. As Arion Aircraft‘s Nick Otterback put it, “Since this month seems to offer many open houses I wanted to share ours.
Post-AirVenture 2014 News Review
Summer’s big show is over and most aviation business folks are back home having that love/hate affair with email that piled up while we worked the event. On whole, the success story is strong. Airplanes sold, crowds were good, accidents were few, and the weather was not smoking hot like it has been in years past (though brief rain showers kept folks dashing for cover on occasion). EAA says attendance was up from last year, that the numbers of airplanes was higher, and that campgrounds reached capacity by midweek. EAA’s special 10th Anniversary of Sport Pilot/Light-Sport Aircraft Exhibit drew well all week with 17 aircraft representing all sectors within the SP/LSA space. Visitors could hardly miss the wonderfully central space AirVenture planners offered for this one-year display. With the front corners presenting a bright green Van’s RV-12 plus the freshly debuted MVP seaplane attendees were practically compelled to wander the space and see all the flying machines.
R.E.S.T. — Rotax Offers Extended Warranty
Rotax BRP is offering a new warranty extension program but it plans more. The Austrian supplier of some 80% of the powerplants used in Light-Sport Aircraft and light kit aircraft is also building a flight school locator for training operations that use their engine. Consumers have some locator services now — in fact, our own FIRM List offers resources — but most (including ours) are USA-centric. As a supplier of engines around the world, Rotax will build a locator service for the entire globe. For many that struggle to find a flight school using Light-Sport Aircraft, this should be most welcome. More on that as it develops R.E.S.T. stands for Rotax Extended Service Terms. The company introduced two new warranty extension programs for its consumers scheduled to start in November 2013. “The R.E.S.T. program provides a warranty extension for all new Rotax 4-stroke aircraft engines,” Rotax said.
Zenith Flies the Rotax 912iS on their CH 750
Zenith Aircraft is one of the country or world’s most successful providers of kit aircraft. Several thousands of all models are flying. One of their most popular is the “Sky Jeep,” otherwise known by the more pedestrian designation, CH 750. Plenty of reasons tell the story of why Zenith in Mexico, Missouri can sell solidly through good times and bad but arguably one of the most important is the company’s support for many different engines. Since Zenith sells Experimental Amateur Built (51%) kits, owners can install whatever they like and Zenith supports multiple engine installations. Now, they’ve added one of the very newest: Rotax BRP’s fuel injected 912iS. Zenith now offers the 912iS as an engine choice from a list of powerplants that includes the 100-hp 912 ULS, the turbo Rotax 914, the fuel-injected UL Power (video) and Viking engines, as well as the Continental 0-200 and the Lycoming 0-235/233 engines.
Zenith’s CH 750 Is a Success In China
China, China, China … Americans hear a lot about this fast growing country although financial news outlets say growth is slowing as its economy matures. American pilots have been hearing plenty, too. Sometimes it seems like an unending list of companies (Cirrus Design, Continental Motors, Mooney Aircraft, several LSA seaplane manufacturers and various other enterprises) that report gaining Chinese investment. We have several times written about western light aircraft builders gaining approval to sell in China after meeting requirements from the country’s aviation authorities. We have even seen a number of Chinese-designed light aircraft some of which are exploring new new ideas. European and other aircraft are offered for sale at shows though deliveries remain modest. Behind all this bustle of activity Zenith Aircraft has been quietly collecting orders and making shipments. Indeed, they released fresh news about their success in China.
Proving STOL Means “Short Takeoff & Landing”
Among Light-Sport Aircraft enthusiasts, certain qualities of our wonderful airplanes are compelling. While fuel efficiency is high on the list as are great visibility and modest prices, another characteristic often rises high in the minds of aviators: STOL, shorthand for Short Takeoff and Landing. Now honestly, virtually all our aircraft exhibit much shorter takeoffs and landings than nearly any general aviation airplane, owing to the light weight and high power-to-weight ratio of LSA. However, even among the standard good performance, some machine rise more quickly than others. For decades, Zenith Aircraft has sold the CH 701 and now the CH 750 that offer some of the best short field performance of any light plane. Recently the company described an event down under (where it is summertime). “Down under” in this case means New Zealand. Every year pilots gather in Omaka, New Zealand for the Healthy Bastards STOL Competition. This year Zenith reported their aircraft took first and second place in the microlight or LSA 1,320 pound category.
Zenith Now Shipping CH 750 Cruzer
Zenith Aircraft based in Mexico … Missouri, to be clear, is one of the most solid and impressive kit producers in the light aircraft world. Chris Heintz designs were previously manufactured as fully built LSA by another company. Though that organization discontinued some years back the kit supplier and its models have thrived as before, every year delivering a number of airplane kits that could make other producers jealous. Last year Zenith introduced their newest model as a variation of their very popular “Sky Jeep,” known officially as the CH 750 STOL. Giving the airplane more cross cruising capability resulted in an airplane logically named Cruzer. Simply put by 20-year Zenith demo pilot veteran Roger Dubbert, “Some of our customers wanted an aircraft that would go a little faster.” The total change added about 20% to cruise speed compared to the 750 STOL. Recently, Zenith announced shipment of the first CH 750 Cruzer kits.
Ugly Duckling, Roomy & Flies… well, like a Duck
Aviator opinion is widespread about CH 701 and CH 750 being ugly ducklings. Fortunately, plenty of pilots don’t care about looks so long as an airplane flies well (750 does!) and for some the, ahem… distinctive look of 750 is a thing of pride. Think Hummer or the old Volkswagen Thing. Or in the aviation field, think Storch. *** Indeed, Zenith Aircraft Company has shipped more than 1,000 of these birds and the company is presently putting out 200 kits a year* — an enviable performance that most light airplane producers would love to report. *** You might guess 750 replaced 701, but as I discovered both remain in production. The 701 carries a somewhat lower price tag and it is lighter, which allows a builder to use a smaller engine that consumes less fuel. *** CH 750 (video) takes advantage of the LSA weight limit of 1,320 pounds, rising from 701’s 1,100-pound gross weight.
How Do Light-Sport Aircraft Handle Winter?
As winter arrives in much of the USA, it is worth asking: “Are Light-Sport Aircraft solely fair weather flyers or can they serve greater purposes?” When trying to answer let’s avoid the error of generalizing. The range of LSA is very broad and ranges from below $40,000 to $150,000 or more and from conventional fixed wings to weight shift, powered parachutes, motorgliders, gyros, hot-air and more. One answer to the winter question won’t suffice. Secondly, not all LSA are factory built so the rules differ. Nonetheless, one thing is certain: Winter or summer, LSA can certainly be useful even if they are not used for compensation flying or flown for hire. Take the following example. Richard Lauzon operates his Zenith CH-801 in conjunction with his Ten Mile Lodge in northern Quebec. He reported, “STOL CH 801 is by far the most practical means of getting in and out of [my] hunting/fishing resort.” The nearest airport is 45 flying minutes to the south.
Zenith Opens Its Hangar to Big Crowds
We interrupt our series on Oshkosh Elements to highlight the upcoming Zenith Open Hangar Day. The event taking place on Saturday, September 21, 2013 is the company’s 22nd annual such event and it draws a large crowd as you can see in last year’s photo. Normally, one company opening its doors to customers and visitors is not big news but Zenith has done particularly well with their open house. For many recent years, Zenith has steadily been delivering kits at the rate of about 200 units per year, a volume most airframe makers would love to match and one that puts Zenith near the top of the list (if not the alphabet). It means the company has developed a large following and, when invited, they turn out. Given the focus on the Midwest LSA Expo at the beginning of September, one could say the Midwest will be active region for LSA and light kit enthusiasts.
Aero Friedrichshafen Video Bonanza
We were busy at Aero Friedrichshafen 2013, knocking out more than 30 videos for your viewing information and entertainment. That’s more than seven videos per day and a sum of more than five hours total running time (more than three Hollywood movies in minutes of viewing time). With these and all the videos shot at Sun ‘n Fun the week before Aero started, we expect to offer more than 300 videos on our LSA Video page. I’d like for you to understand how much effort that represents. I’d also like to thank BRS Parachutes, ICP North America, and Renegade Light Sport Aircraft for providing financial assistance to Lightsport and Ultralight Flyer. Without their support, these videos would not likely have been made. Today, I uploaded more than a dozen new videos to ByDanJohnson.com. We have many more coming. The newest ones include • Introduction to Aero and what you’ll see • Tecnam’s aerobatic Snap • FlyEco’s Diesel engine • FK 51 replica Mustang • Yuneec’s electric-powered eSpyder • lightweight electric aircraft • Zlin’s customizable Bobber • ICP’s Savannah taildragger and new engine • BOT SpeedCruiser with D-Motor • BRM Aero’s Bristell taildragger • Phoenix Air’s electric-powered ePhoenix • Nando Groppo tri-gear and, • one from AirVenture 2012 on the Zenith CH-650.
Zenith Unveils Smoother, Faster CH 750 Cruzer
At Sun ‘n Fun 2013, big kit manufacturer Zenith Aircraft debuted their new CH 750 Cruzer. Is it truly something new under the Sun (‘n Fun)? Zenith said, “While influenced by its well-known STOL predecessors — STOL CH 701 “Sky Jeep,” CH 750, and four-seat CH 801 sport utility aircraft — the CH 750 Cruzer is an all-new design.” Company president Sebastien Heintz observed that many customers do not need off-airport capability or extreme STOL (short take-off and landing) performance so his team optimized the new design for cruise and more conventional hard-surface airports while yet retaining the popular enlarged cabin features of the STOL CH 750. Zenith‘s new Cruzer 750 sports a brand-new airfoil with a single streamlined strut. The empennage is also new with a symmetrical stabilizer and a shortened horizontal tail span. The vertical tail features a fin and rudder replacing the traditional all-moving vertical tail design of the STOL series.
Zenith’s CH 701 Kit is Sport Pilot-Ready
Seating | 2, side-by-side |
Empty weight | 580 pounds |
Gross weight | 1,100 pounds |
Wingspan | 27 feet |
Wing area | 122 square feet |
Wing loading | 9.0 pounds/square foot |
Useful Load | 520 pounds |
Length | 20.9 feet |
Payload (with full fuel) | 400 pounds |
Cabin Interior | 41 inches at shoulder |
Height | 8.6 feet |
Fuel Capacity | 20 gallons |
Baggage area | 40 pounds, cabin shelf |
Kit type | Construction kit |
Build time | 350 to 400 hours |
Standard engine | Rotax 912 |
Power | 80 hp at 5,800 rpm |
Power loading | 13.8 pounds/hp |
Max Speed | 95 mph |
Cruise speed | 80 mph |
Stall Speed | 30 mph |
Never exceed speed | 110 mph |
Rate of climb at gross | 1,200 fpm |
Service Ceiling | 12,000+ |
Takeoff distance at gross | 90 feet |
Landing distance at gross | 150 feet |
Range (powered) | 400 miles - 5 hours |
Fuel Consumption | about 4.0 gph |
Standard Features | 80-hp Rotax 912, with electric starter, stainless steel exhaust, radiator, and 3-blade Warp Drive prop; dual 10-gallon fuel wing tanks (20 galoms total); wide, dual doors; independent hydraulic brakes; mechanical flaps; 16-inch tundra tires, removable wings (also see options); complete engine instrument package (Rotax); fully enclosed cabin; in-flight trim; sturdy single piece landing gear construction; steerable nosewheel; all-metal wings, tail, and fuselage; seat belts with shoulder harness. |
Options | 100-hp Rotax 912S (as tested) and several other engine sizes and brands; additional fuel tanks (40 gallons total); electric trim; folding wings; amphibious or straight floats; cockpit-widening "bubble" doors (add six inches of effective cabin space and more visibility); navigation and strobe lights; cabin heat (with Rotax engine); additional instruments. |
Construction | All-metal airframe, wing, and tail; many skins predrilled; factory-riveted wing spars and lower cabin frame sides; fiberglass fairing. Kit components made in the USA; sold by U.S.-owned company. |
Design
Cosmetic appearance, structural integrity, achievement of design goals, effectiveness of aerodynamics, ergonomics.
Pros - Short takeoff and landing (STOL) design uses fixed slats to achieve excellent performance. Highly functional aircraft; can operate easily from short, unimproved strips. More than 20 years of field experience with more than 700 CH 701's flying.
Cons - If you're looking for sleek or pretty, the CH 701 isn't your bird. Not fast enough for regular, long cross-country flights. Available only in kit form at present (though cost is therefore lower). Builder remains the "manufacturer" indefinitely.
Systems
Subsystems available to pilot such as: Flaps; Fuel sources; Electric start; In-air restart; Brakes; Engine controls; Navigations; Radio; (items covered may be optional).
Pros - Flaps, trim, electric start, differential brakes are all standard on the CH 701. Fuel (20 gallons standard) contained in the wings, away from occupants. Engine access through easily removed cowling. Generous useful load allows adding optional equipment without losing utility.
Cons - Flap handle proved challenging for me to deploy to the last notch (though this may have been a fact of the new, test aircraft). Trim control located only on left half of stick. Flap position must be checked via lever position or visual; no indicator (though builder could add it if desired).
Cockpit/Cabin
Instrumentation; Ergonomics of controls; Creature comforts; (items covered may be optional).
Pros - With "bubble" doors, the CH 701 is adequately roomy for all but the largest occupants. Baggage space in hat rack position. Very easy entry through wide doors; good for larger or less flexible occupants. Shoulder belts standard. Doors secure well. Reach to panel is good.
Cons - Cabin is modestly wide compared to many LSA (though "bubble" doors add effective width). Center joystick tended to hit right-seat occupant in flight (though I was deflecting more than most normal inputs). Interior is rather Spartan unless builder elaborates.
Ground Handling
Taxi visibility; Steering; Turn radius; Shock absorption; Stance/Stability; Braking.
Pros - Strong, differential brakes aid ground handling. Gear and structure can handle fairly rough terrain. Skylight adds good upward visibility for traffic checking prior to takeoff. Landing gear easily able to handle fairly rough terrain. Good ground clearance.
Cons - Lateral visibility is less open than in the bubble canopy CH 601. Test aircraft had brakes only on the left; going dual will add some cost and weight. No other ground handling negatives.
Takeoff/Landing
Qualities; Efficiency; Ease; Comparative values.
Pros - Takeoff is very rapid and requires a very short distance, perhaps the model's top attribute; ground roll is only 100 feet and rotation starts almost immediately, thanks partly to leading edge slats. Approach speeds can be very slow with practice, good for the shortest field landings.
Cons - Landings have a slight challenge that demands a little practice; you must keep the nose up once lifted or the CH 701 merely resumes flying. Sink rate after power retarded is quite high (1,000 fpm); this is a useful design feature allowing STOL landings, but you have to anticipate.
Control
Quality and quantity for: Coordination; Authority; Pressures; Response; and Coupling.
Pros - Aileron forces were very pleasant and responsive. Efficient rudder control surface, a full flying design (but see "Cons"). Pitch forces were light without being sensitive, a good combination. Control forces at very low airspeeds permitted by wing/slat design were reasonable.
Cons - Control harmony hard to check in test aircraft as rudders were still tightly adjusted; tended to stick slightly (though possibly only on this aircraft). Wing can fly so slowly that controls necessarily become more sluggish due to low airflow.
Performance
Climb; Glide; Sink; Cruise/stall/max speeds; Endurance; Range; Maneuverability.
Pros - Terrific takeoff performance, better than all but the very lightest ultralights. Climb very strong at 1,000+ fpm at gross. Very capable airplane for low-and-slow flying over landable terrain; extremely slow speeds (in the 30s) with practice and caution.
Cons - Rather high idle thrust sink rate (1,000 fpm); neither glide is very long (though this is considered a deliberate design feature for a STOL airplane). Cruise speed of 80 mph won't carry you too far. Fuel at 20 gallons standard is four hours or less (though sufficient for most operations).
Stability
Stall recovery and characteristics; Dampening; Spiral stability; Adverse yaw qualities.
Pros - Mild stalls at most angles and speeds (though see "Cons"). Longitudinal and lateral stability appeared very normal in all tests. Response to power input/decrease from trim flight was positive and predictable with few oscillations.
Cons - Stalls with the 100-hp CH 701 (as tested) can be done aggressively enough to cause a sharper break (though recovery remains quick and simple). Adverse yaw was quite significant, something to be remembered at very low speeds the CH 701 can achieve.
Overall
Addresses the questions: "Will a buyer get what he/she expects to buy, and did the designer/builder achieve the chosen goal?"
Pros - Longtime, well-proven supplier (est. 1992) gets excellent comments from customers for technical support and customer service. Can be flown by Sport Pilot certificate holder. Can get airborne with good basic equipment for about $35,000 (and 400 hours of your labor), far less than many light sport aircraft.
Cons - Not a Special- or Experimenta light-sport aircraft (yet), so Amateur-built rules mean builder always remains the "manufacturer," with attendant legal responsibility. Build time is 350 to 400 hours (though factory support can ease the burden). Even $35,000 is more than some ultralight kits (though with 4-stroke engines, it will be closer).
Every Light Sport & Ultralight Flying magazine reader has probably heard of off-road vehicles. How about an “off-airport” flying machine? You may not have used the term but you probably know one of the candidates: Zenith Aircraft’s highly functional CH 701. No one calls the CH 701 the most handsome aircraft in the fleet. That title may be better reserved for sleek carbon fiber jobs. But as a practical aircraft appealing to ultralight enthusiasts, the Chris Heintz design with a 20-year history is head of its class. While the design has not changed much in those two decades, the kit has changed quite a bit to make the builder’s effort easier. The designs of engineer Chris Heintz have been around a long time, beginning with his early Zipper ultralight-like aircraft. A prolific and versatile creator, his aircraft models have put nearly 3,000 builders in the air. The low-wing CH 601 series is the most popular at better than 60% of all Zenith models followed by more than 700 CH 701’s now flying around the world.
The Range of LSA is Wide as the USA
Plenty of folks think LSA are mainly carbon fiber speedsters with autopilots and huge computer screen instrumentation. No doubt, we have some beauties that are equipped like luxury sport planes. If you’ve got the budget, the Light-Sport industry has the aircraft. Yet not everyone can afford those birds and not everyone wants one. *** FAA pretty much eliminated ultralights when they came out with the SP/LSA rule… well, except for genuine ultralights of the single place variety. The latter still exist, and yes, you can still buy a ready-to-fly ultralight “vehicle” for which you need no N-number, no medical, and no pilot license. Those 254-pound (max empty weight) aircraft prove America remains the land of the free and I, for one, love to fly them. *** On our way north for AirVenture my wife, Randee, and I made a series of stops. In Alabama — just a mile apart — we hit two fixed wing producers of “ultralights” that qualify as official SLSA.
Budget Builds (Low Cost Homebuilts)
Seating | 2 side-by-side |
Empty weight | 600 lbs |
Gross weight | 1,150 lbs |
Wingspan | 28.5 ft |
Wing area | 128 sq. ft |
Wing loading | 9.3 lbs/sq. ft |
Useful Load | 550 pounds |
Length | 19 feet 9 inches |
Cabin Interior | 38 inches |
Height | 6 feet 1 innch |
Load Limit | +5.7, -2.28 g |
Fuel Capacity | 12 gallons 1 |
Baggage area | hat rack |
Notes: | 1 Optional wing tanks available at 7 gallons each. |
Standard engine | Rotax 912, 80 hp |
Power | 65-100 hp |
Power loading | 14.3 lbs/hp |
Max Speed | 120 mph |
Cruise speed | 90-100 mph |
Economy Cruise | Duration-3 hrs, Range-250 miles, Fuel Consumption (Economical)-about 3.0gph |
Stall Speed | 35 mph |
Never exceed speed | 120 mph |
Rate of climb at gross | 800 fpm |
Takeoff distance at gross | 350 ft |
Landing distance at gross | 400 ft |
Notes: | Service Ceiling (est.)-10,000 ft. |
Seating | 2, side-by-side |
Empty weight | 700 pounds |
Gross weight | 1,300 pounds |
Wingspan | 27.0 feet |
Wing area | 132 square feet |
Wing loading | 9.8 pounds/per square foot |
Length | 20 feet |
Height | 6.5 feet |
Fuel Capacity | 24 gallons, usable |
Standard engine | Rotax 912 S |
Power | 100 hp* |
Power loading | 13.0 pounds/hp* |
Max Speed | 180 mph |
Cruise speed | 132 mph** |
Stall Speed | 44 mph |
Never exceed speed | 180 mph |
Rate of climb at gross | 900 fpm |
Takeoff distance at gross | 550 feet |
Landing distance at gross | 500 feet |
Range (powered) | 600 miles |
Notes: | * Assumes the Rotax 912S engine, per factory literature.
** Meets the proposed light-sport aircraft category with correct prop, assuming maximum continuous power. |
Seating | 2, side-by-side |
Empty weight | 1,105 1 |
Gross weight | 1,600 2 |
Wingspan | 24.3 feet |
Wing area | 97.1 square feet |
Wing loading | 16.5 pounds/square foot |
Useful Load | 495 pounds |
Length | 19.5 feet |
Cabin Interior | 40 inch width |
Height | 5.5 feet |
Fuel Capacity | 25-61 gallons 3 |
Baggage area | 80 pounds |
Notes: | 1 equipped as Schmidtbauer's Mustang II 2 flown in normal category, the factory allows up to 1850-lb. gross, but only if the additional weight is fuel in the wings; aerobatic category limits gross weight to 1350 lb. 3 37 gallons in aircraft tested All specs and performance were provided by the factory and assume a conventional Mustang II kit with a 200-hp engine. Figures stated in the article were for Schmidtbauer's customized Mustang II. |
Standard engine | 200-hp Lycoming IO-360 |
Power loading | 8 pounds/horsepower |
Max Speed | 230 mph 1 |
Cruise speed | 220 mph |
Stall Speed | 58 mph |
Rate of climb at gross | 1,900 fpm |
Service Ceiling | 20,000 feet |
Takeoff distance at gross | 470 feet |
Landing distance at gross | 680 feet |
Notes: | 1 for 200-hp engine; 210 mph with 160-hp engine |
Seating | 2, side by side |
Empty weight | 620 lb |
Gross weight | 1,100 lb |
Wingspan | 22 feet |
Wing loading | 11.22 lb/sq.ft |
Useful Load | 480 lb |
Payload (with full fuel) | 384 lb |
Cabin Interior | 40 inch |
Fuel Capacity | 16 Gal |
Baggage area | 50 lb |
Standard engine | AeroVee 2180 |
Prop Diameter | Sensenich 2 blade fixed-pitch |
Power | 80 hp@3400 rpm |
Cruise speed | 150 mph (130 kt) 8000 feet @ 75% power |
Stall Speed (Flaps) | 40 mph (35 kt) |
Stall Speed | 46 mph (40 kt) |
Rate of climb at gross | 500 fpm (1,200 at aerobatic weight) |
Takeoff distance at gross | 400 ft |
Landing distance at gross | 500 ft |
Fuel Consumption | 4 gph |
Options | Engine: Jabiru 2200 Engine: Jabiru 2300 |
Yes! You can build and fly a “real” airplane for the cost of a new SUV. Contrary to popular opinion, airplanes don’t have to be outrageously expensive-at least not all of them. The Sport Pilot/Light-Sport Aircraft initiative is one program that promises to lower the cost of ready-to-fly aircraft. But many of these Special LSAs and Experimental LSAs will be priced well more than $40,000 and can run upwards of $85,000. One way to get airborne for less than $40K is to choose an ultralight, powered parachute or weight-shift trike. But if you want something more conventional, more comfortable or larger, you’re likely to find what you want in the world of kit aircraft. After all these years, building an Experimental/ Amateur-Built airplane still qualifies as one of the least expensive ways to get a get a great airplane into the air on a reasonable budget. Our $40K benchmark is designed to narrow the field for builders on a budget-and that benchmark means a completed, ready-for-flight airplane.
Under Intense Scrutiny — Zenith & AMD CH-601XL
Bad as in-flight break-up accidents are, many opinions often blur the big picture. Last spring NTSB recommended FAA “ground the fleet,” so to say. FAA chose further study. When additional CH-601s became involved, media and organizations jumped on the bandwagon. Let’s review. *** The focus is on the CH-601XL, of which about 1,500 kits have been sold since its introduction in 1984. Approximately half are complete and flying, said Zenith boss, Sebastien Heintz. *** Of the airplanes that broke up two were fully-built SLSA. One was built by Czech Aircraft Works; the other by AMD. The rest are owner-built kits… essentially one-off airplanes. Comparing one to a factory-built airplane is apples and oranges. *** Some allege Zenith and AMD have ignored the problem, but lots of detailed info on Zenith’s website suggests otherwise. Sebastien buttressed this saying, “We believe our effort is an example of an industry doing the right thing.
Canada’s Sky Jeep
Seating | 2, side-by-side |
Empty weight | 580 pounds |
Gross weight | 1,100 pounds |
Wingspan | 27 feet |
Wing area | 122 square feet |
Wing loading | 9.0 pounds/square foot |
Useful Load | 520 pounds |
Length | 20.9 feet |
Payload (with full fuel) | 400 pounds |
Cabin Interior | 41 inches at shoulder |
Height | 8.6 feet |
Fuel Capacity | 20 gallons |
Baggage area | 40 pounds, cabin shelf |
Kit type | Construction kit |
Build time | 350 to 400 hours |
Standard engine | Rotax 912 |
Power | 80 hp at 5,800 rpm |
Power loading | 13.8 pounds/hp |
Max Speed | 95 mph |
Cruise speed | 80 mph |
Stall Speed | 30 mph |
Never exceed speed | 110 mph |
Rate of climb at gross | 1,200 fpm |
Service Ceiling | 12,000+ |
Takeoff distance at gross | 90 feet |
Landing distance at gross | 150 feet |
Range (powered) | 400 miles - 5 hours |
Fuel Consumption | about 4.0 gph |
Standard Features | 80-hp Rotax 912, with electric starter, stainless steel exhaust, radiator, and 3-blade Warp Drive prop; dual 10-gallon fuel wing tanks (20 galoms total); wide, dual doors; independent hydraulic brakes; mechanical flaps; 16-inch tundra tires, removable wings (also see options); complete engine instrument package (Rotax); fully enclosed cabin; in-flight trim; sturdy single piece landing gear construction; steerable nosewheel; all-metal wings, tail, and fuselage; seat belts with shoulder harness. |
Options | 100-hp Rotax 912S (as tested) and several other engine sizes and brands; additional fuel tanks (40 gallons total); electric trim; folding wings; amphibious or straight floats; cockpit-widening "bubble" doors (add six inches of effective cabin space and more visibility); navigation and strobe lights; cabin heat (with Rotax engine); additional instruments. |
Construction | All-metal airframe, wing, and tail; many skins predrilled; factory-riveted wing spars and lower cabin frame sides; fiberglass fairing. Kit components made in the USA; sold by U.S.-owned company. |
Design
Cosmetic appearance, structural integrity, achievement of design goals, effectiveness of aerodynamics, ergonomics.
Pros - Short takeoff and landing (STOL) design uses fixed slats to achieve excellent performance. Highly functional aircraft; can operate easily from short, unimproved strips. More than 20 years of field experience with more than 700 CH 701's flying.
Cons - If you're looking for sleek or pretty, the CH 701 isn't your bird. Not fast enough for regular, long cross-country flights. Available only in kit form at present (though cost is therefore lower). Builder remains the "manufacturer" indefinitely.
Systems
Subsystems available to pilot such as: Flaps; Fuel sources; Electric start; In-air restart; Brakes; Engine controls; Navigations; Radio; (items covered may be optional).
Pros - Flaps, trim, electric start, differential brakes are all standard on the CH 701. Fuel (20 gallons standard) contained in the wings, away from occupants. Engine access through easily removed cowling. Generous useful load allows adding optional equipment without losing utility.
Cons - Flap handle proved challenging for me to deploy to the last notch (though this may have been a fact of the new, test aircraft). Trim control located only on left half of stick. Flap position must be checked via lever position or visual; no indicator (though builder could add it if desired).
Cockpit/Cabin
Instrumentation; Ergonomics of controls; Creature comforts; (items covered may be optional).
Pros - With "bubble" doors, the CH 701 is adequately roomy for all but the largest occupants. Baggage space in hat rack position. Very easy entry through wide doors; good for larger or less flexible occupants. Shoulder belts standard. Doors secure well. Reach to panel is good.
Cons - Cabin is modestly wide compared to many LSA (though "bubble" doors add effective width). Center joystick tended to hit right-seat occupant in flight (though I was deflecting more than most normal inputs). Interior is rather Spartan unless builder elaborates.
Ground Handling
Taxi visibility; Steering; Turn radius; Shock absorption; Stance/Stability; Braking.
Pros - Strong, differential brakes aid ground handling. Gear and structure can handle fairly rough terrain. Skylight adds good upward visibility for traffic checking prior to takeoff. Landing gear easily able to handle fairly rough terrain. Good ground clearance.
Cons - Lateral visibility is less open than in the bubble canopy CH 601. Test aircraft had brakes only on the left; going dual will add some cost and weight. No other ground handling negatives.
Takeoff/Landing
Qualities; Efficiency; Ease; Comparative values.
Pros - Takeoff is very rapid and requires a very short distance, perhaps the model's top attribute; ground roll is only 100 feet and rotation starts almost immediately, thanks partly to leading edge slats. Approach speeds can be very slow with practice, good for the shortest field landings.
Cons - Landings have a slight challenge that demands a little practice; you must keep the nose up once lifted or the CH 701 merely resumes flying. Sink rate after power retarded is quite high (1,000 fpm); this is a useful design feature allowing STOL landings, but you have to anticipate.
Control
Quality and quantity for: Coordination; Authority; Pressures; Response; and Coupling.
Pros - Aileron forces were very pleasant and responsive. Efficient rudder control surface, a full flying design (but see "Cons"). Pitch forces were light without being sensitive, a good combination. Control forces at very low airspeeds permitted by wing/slat design were reasonable.
Cons - Control harmony hard to check in test aircraft as rudders were still tightly adjusted; tended to stick slightly (though possibly only on this aircraft). Wing can fly so slowly that controls necessarily become more sluggish due to low airflow.
Performance
Climb; Glide; Sink; Cruise/stall/max speeds; Endurance; Range; Maneuverability.
Pros - Terrific takeoff performance, better than all but the very lightest ultralights. Climb very strong at 1,000+ fpm at gross. Very capable airplane for low-and-slow flying over landable terrain; extremely slow speeds (in the 30s) with practice and caution.
Cons - Rather high idle thrust sink rate (1,000 fpm); neither glide is very long (though this is considered a deliberate design feature for a STOL airplane). Cruise speed of 80 mph won't carry you too far. Fuel at 20 gallons standard is four hours or less (though sufficient for most operations).
Stability
Stall recovery and characteristics; Dampening; Spiral stability; Adverse yaw qualities.
Pros - Mild stalls at most angles and speeds (though see "Cons"). Longitudinal and lateral stability appeared very normal in all tests. Response to power input/decrease from trim flight was positive and predictable with few oscillations.
Cons - Stalls with the 100-hp CH 701 (as tested) can be done aggressively enough to cause a sharper break (though recovery remains quick and simple). Adverse yaw was quite significant, something to be remembered at very low speeds the CH 701 can achieve.
Overall
Addresses the questions: "Will a buyer get what he/she expects to buy, and did the designer/builder achieve the chosen goal?"
Pros - Longtime, well-proven supplier (est. 1992) gets excellent comments from customers for technical support and customer service. Can be flown by Sport Pilot certificate holder. Can get airborne with good basic equipment for about $35,000 (and 400 hours of your labor), far less than many light sport aircraft.
Cons - Not a Special- or Experimenta light-sport aircraft (yet), so Amateur-built rules mean builder always remains the "manufacturer," with attendant legal responsibility. Build time is 350 to 400 hours (though factory support can ease the burden). Even $35,000 is more than some ultralight kits (though with 4-stroke engines, it will be closer).
Pilots will go to great lengths to fly airplanes they like. I went to the Czech Republic to fly the CH 701. That’ s a long way, and I did like the airplane. The experience tells a story of light-sport aircraft development that may become increasingly common. Like most light plane pilots, I’ve long been familiar with the designs of Swiss-born engineer Chris Heintz. His many aircraft models have put some 2,000 builders in the air. The low-wing, Piper Cherokee-like CH 601 is far and away the most popular air plane he’s designed, with it representing more than 60 percent of all Zenith models sold. Yet, perhaps the most distinctive-looking design he’s offered is the short takeoff and landing (STOL) capable CH 701, the subject of our discussion this month. Now the world grows smaller with Heintz’s Canadian designs being manufactured in the Czech Republic and freighted to the United States for fun in the sky.