Recently I wrote about an American classic, Luscombe’s Model 8 LSA. We can go back even further in time and uncover a handsome flock of highly affordable airplanes that also check the vintage box.
Welcome to Robert Baslee‘s amazing production of vintage early 20th Century airplanes that ordinary people can build and fly.
Airdrome’s many models — five of which can be built as Part 103 ultralights — look like a page from history but fly well in the modern world.
Here is one man’s very successful mission to both preserve aviation heritage and give you the chance to participate in the fun …without having to do all the research Robert does. As a bonus, many of these kits assemble much faster than many kit designs.
Meet Airdrome Aeroplanes
Robert is incredibly productive. In the video below, he notes he has introduced 25 new models in 25 years. While I know several other light aircraft designers with long lists of models created, none appear to equal the sheer output of Baslee. He operates the Airdrome Aeroplanes website that is chock-full of information.
“But he’s just copying old designs and remaking them,” said one naysayer.
“Oh, really,” I thought! “You actually believe Robert can glance a few old drawings and then whip out a 75%-scale version made of modern materials — and with flight characteristics that modern pilots will find acceptable? Do you you genuinely think that could be an easy task?”
Anyone who concludes resurrecting these aircraft is easy greatly undervalues the effort it takes to thoroughly research and examine one of these vintage World War I flying machines and recreate them using the knowledge of the 21st century.
According to several pilots who have built and flown one of Robert’s many models, these are well-achieved replicas that fly well, perform according to expectations, and are delivered in kits you can build in surprisingly short times.
“Any one of these legendary flying machines can be yours in a reasonably short period of time, approximately 300-400 man hours,” said Robert. “Construction can be accomplished in a space about the size of a one-car garage. Each of our kits have been setup to allow easy construction using only basic hand tools. All machined and welded parts come pre-done. With the aid of our construction video and unlimited builder support, even the first time builder will find construction quick, easy, and rewarding.”
How about operating one of these vintage aircraft?
“Flying an aircraft constructed with your own hands will provide endless hours of fun and excitement,” added Robert. “Imagine yourself in the cockpit, donned in a leather flying helmet, goggles, and a white silk scarf, the horizon backdropped by the warm glow of the setting sun… this is an experience that very few people will ever know.” A few Airdrome pilots I’ve met confirm these are easy-to-fly aircraft.
Readers with further questions or those ready to purchase one of Airdrome’s flying machines can contact Robert by phone at 816-230-8585 or send him an email.
While working on the coming Part 103 List, I discovered that among the many models Robert has developed, Airdrome reports five can be built as Part 103s. Of course, as with most 103 ultralights, the builder will have to use care and not elect many options if he or she is going to stay compliant. Nonetheless, Airdrome ultralight candidtates are surprisingly light aircraft
Models include: Fokker E-III; Fokker D-VIII; Fokker D-VI; Dream Classic; Dream Fantasy; and …yes, “Eindekker (Fokker E-III) can be built as a fully legal ultralight,” confirmed Robert.
How Much? This is one of the most common questions. Answers are hard for two reasons: you can configure a kit-built airplane in many ways and it’s impossible to price all variations; and, these articles last a long time and the value of money changes through inflation.
Yet whenever you look at them, these should qualify as very affordable ultralight models.
In 2020, the Dream Classic wire-braced model airframe kit listed for only $3,495; a strut braced version is $3,995. To this you’ll add an engine (used 447s and 503s in reasonably good condition sell for something similar) and prop plus paint, interior finishing, and instruments. It is very possible to get in the air for less than $10,000.
Building an airplane for less than one-third the cost of the average new automobile reflects a true bargain. That such a construction will turn heads everywhere you go is icing on the cake.
Airdrome Aeroplanes Dream Classic
Standard Wing (a Speed Wing is also available)
Dream Classic Ultralight is a three-axis aircraft with a side-mount stick. It is covered with the certified Poly Fiber process. This kit comes with all machining and required welding pre-done. Construction time is normally around 100-120 hours.
- Wing Span — 30 feet 6 inches
- Wing Chord — 48 inches
- Wing Area — 122 square feet
- Empty Weight — 241 pounds (meets 103)
- Gross Weight — 491 pounds
- Useful Load — 250 pounds
- Payload (assuming 5 gallons of fuel) — 220 pounds
- Wing loading — 4.02 pounds per square foot
- Power to Weight Ratio — 12.28 pounds per horsepower
- Stall Speed — 26 mph (meets 103)
- Cruise Speed — 57 mph
- Top Speed — 63 mph (meets 103)
- Rate of Climb — 850 feet per minute
- Takeoff Distance — 95 feet
- Engine — Rotax 447
- Engine requirements for Dream Fantasy ultralight:
- Minimum Weight — 68 pounds
- Maximum Weight — 92 pounds
- Minimum Horsepower — 28
- Maximum Horsepower — 52 (output of a Rotax 503)
We have not interviewed Robert Baslee about his ultralight models but his methods are similar for all the many airplanes he has created. Here we check out a “movie star.”
Kris ODENHEIMER says
I haven’t flown an ultralight in 40 years so I’m a beginner again? What plane would be the best Buck for my dollar and the easiest one to learn again on.
Dan Johnson says
Your question is impossible because I don’t know your background, experience, desires, or budget, among other things. The Part 103 List is the place to start. Pick airplanes that you like. You can often read more about them on this website. Then use the contact info to reach out to those of highest interest.
The name of he plane is Eindecker (mono wing) and not Einedekker. That might be pettifogging but it hurts the eyes of native speakers.
Nevertheless, I like your web site and enjoy your videos.
Dan Johnson says
You are right (of course!). I do not recall where I got the spelling I used, but I took your advice to correct the error in the article. The lead image has the incorrect spelling as well, but that is harder to change everywhere it now appears. My apology for misusing your language but thanks for the kind worlds about the website and videos!
By the way, I am Dan, not Don. (Hey, it happens! ?)
RICHARD A NORRIS says
Dan, what are your thoughts about Terrafugia moving to China?
Dan Johnson says
China has been a reliable place for American aviation companies to go to find cash — Cirrus, Mooney, Diamond, Continental Motors, and more have all become Chinese majority owned. Why not Terrafugia? (This does not signal my approval or disapproval.)