Many Americans will agree
the name of this aircraft is odd, and that may be a kind word for the common reaction to “Sinus.” Is the name that important? Sinus (pronounced Seen-us), the aircraft, is a sleek, slender machine capable of impressive performance.
Any soaring-attuned pilot can easily live with the name Sinus for the 49-foot span and, get this, 28-to-1 glide performance! On first glance, except for its elegant, shapely, and thin wings, the Sinus looks like a proper light sport airplane. Pilot Matevz Lenarcic flew one around the world solo, in 80 days, and with zero ground or air support (see “Microlight Motorglider Flies Around the World,” April ’05 UltralightFlying! magazine).
What’s In a Name After All?
Let’s consider that name. U.S. dealer Robert Mudd says Pipistrel – the manufacturer – prefers to pronounce it “seen-us,” not “sighn-us.” They say this refers to a perfect sound wave or sine wave rather than a head cold. Oddly the word “sine” wave sounds closer to the head cold, but maybe we’re splitting hairs here. Who cares about the name? In the same vein, Pipistrel’s shorter-wing model, the Virus (with a mere 40 feet of span) should be pronounced “veer-us” not “vyr-us.” Evidently the mother tongue of Pipistrel articulates letter combinations differently. Get used to it and fly the plane. What’s not to love?
I flew in a Sinus registered as N-2759D, with Mudd, who is based in Moriarity, New Mexico. I can say I anticipated this flight since I first saw the plane at a French airshow back in the early 2000s. The soaring pilot in me was impressed with the glide and sink performance, and the full-feathering prop. But the aviator in me was drawn to those lovely wings with their multiple compounds and svelte, lean shape that carries right out to the upturned winglets at the 49-foot-plus mark.
The Sinus is built in Slovenia, a now independent country once part of Yugoslavia. Slovenia is south of Austria and just east of Italy. The designer of the Sinus, Ivo Boscarol, started his enterprise in Yugoslavia where he built trikes that sold throughout Europe (though none came to the USA). As time passed Boscarol also branched out into propellers and took on a dealership for Rotax engines.
Eleven years ago, Boscarol saw the changes coming to microlight aviation in Europe and created the Sinus. His first thought was to make an aircraft that could easily be used for training glider pilots. Flying sailplanes is a major segment of aviation in Europe so his instinct showed foresight. He also reasoned that such a motorglider could be used for cross-country flying for those not into soaring, and a long-gliding aircraft could be useful – and safer – in heavily mountainous Europe.
By the 1995 Aero show in Friedrichshafen, Germany, the Sinus was debuted and quickly found a receptive market, enough so that close to 200 have been sold. Nearly all Sinus motorgliders remain in Europe, but through Michael Coates’ Australian-based dealership, some are starting to arrive in America.
The Sinus’ wings disconnect readily and all wing controls connect automatically when the wings are refitted. A series of bolts and pins make for secure connections. Both spar ends taper as they approach the opposite side of the cabin and from inside the cockpit you can see how they fit together. A large bolt anchors the spar on each side. But the spar ends are also braced fore and aft with a triangulated center structure (see photo). Mudd says it takes 20 minutes for two or three people to remove the wings. It can also be done with two people and a wingtip stand.
Ultralights and light-sport aircraft (LSA) commonly use wingspans of 28 to 32 feet. The Sinus reaches way out to 49 feet, 11¼3 inches. While this yields a very impressive 28-to-1 glide performance, it also means you’ve got to be careful when taxiing the Sinus between rows of aircraft or near hangars. The task is even more challenging given the aft swept and tipped up wings.
The wings have three control surfaces on them. The Sinus has ailerons, as you’d expect, though they are also way out there and therefore generate quite a bit of adverse yaw. And the airplane has flaps with four positions; neutral plus two go down and one goes up in a nod to another common European design feature not often used in the U.S. When flaps reflex, or move upward slightly, they can add to the speed performance of a wing.
On the Sinus, flaps produce more wing shaping than pure drag, such that when you take off in this long-winged bird, you may and often will use the most extended flap setting. To find enough drag to get this long-gliding aircraft back on terra firma, the Sinus has airbrakes, sometimes called spoilers though the two terms are not truly interchangeable.
Spoilers are not identical to airbrakes in that the former can also be used for steering if so designed where airbrakes produce drag and reduce lift. Most modern airliners use spoilers for both purposes. When landing the Sinus, deployment of the airbrakes and moving the flaps to the reflexed setting helps to transfer the aircraft weight from the wings to the wheels, which helps plant the Sinus securely on the ground and adds to wheel braking effectiveness.
Inside the Sinus’ cockpit, I found plenty of room for normal-sized persons, though even the factory states the pilot height limit is 6 feet, 4 inches. Rudder pedals can adjust to accommodate longer- or shorter-legged occupants.
Visibility is also quite good, certainly to the sides through the large windows built into the gull-wing doors. Forward visibility is significantly more limited by a fairly high instrument panel; especially the way the panel rises up in the middle. You can see out the front fine on approach to landing but during flare, shorter pilots may need to refer to the side view for touchdown, much like you have to on some large engine taildraggers. (This Sinus was equipped with tricycle gear and even that did not help this quality much.)
A wide but rather narrow overhead skylight helps upward visibility in some cases, but it’s overhead where the Sinus has its greatest drawback. I’m of average height (5 feet,10 inches), and as I leaned forward in the seat, my head touched the spars running across the top of the cabin. I could probably live with this – though I’d be tempted to wear a helmet – but a pilot taller than I should definitely sit in the aircraft to evaluate headroom. One tall pilot I spoke to ruled out the Sinus as a choice because he would hit the spar in any forward jolt and this could be quite serious. In addition, the bracing structure to the spars, consisting of stainless steel tubing, is directly overhead each seat. If you’re tall and if turbulence caused you to rise in your seat (seat belts not tightly fastened), you might strike your head firmly. It’s a shame that this interior design is potentially limiting because otherwise the cabin is well designed and comfortable. You’ll want to check out your fit before buying a Sinus.
The seats are comfortably padded and have a small headrest. Four-point pilot restraints are provided and, as I stated, you’ll probably want them snugged firmly to keep you in position. Since soaring flight is normally conducted in air that most pilots would call turbulent, tightly securing seat belts is standard operating procedure. Like cabin height, width also suggests you must be on the lean side. While 43 inches compares well with a Cessna 172, it’s not as broad as many of the new LSA, some of which hit 50 inches or even more.
The dual joysticks and control placements are convenient to both occupants and the instrument panel is within easy reach to read and adjust instruments. Throttle and trim are located just aft of the T-panel. About at your inside hip is the flap lever, clearly marked with a minus sign, a zero, a plus sign, and a double plus sign, which are interpreted as reflexed (upward), neutral, one notch of down flaps, and two notches.
Between the occupants just below the spar carry-throughs is a hefty handle that some might think is the flap handle. Instead this is the airbrake handle. It has a lever to release the brakes from the locked-down position. Mudd says such brakes are referred to as Schempp-Hirth-type airbrakes, and the handle comes down slightly before airbrakes are deployed. As you pull it down, the brakes jump out of the wing and begin their drag production. You can feel it as though you’d hit the brakes in your car fairly firmly. The airbrakes can be used intermittently to finely adjust your descent rate on approach to landing. Once you’ve touched down, having them full on assures you stay put on the runway better than if they are retracted.
Near the airbrake handle in our test Sinus was a ballistic parachute handle. The handle shapes are very different and they aren’t positioned close to one another but you’ll want to be sure which one you’re grabbing.
The Sinus has a 40-pound baggage capacity in a sack aft of the seats, but in our test plane, a ballistic emergency parachute system took up a good share of that capacity. For me, this is a worthy tradeoff, as I like emergency parachutes. Others may lament the loss of baggage capacity.
Your toes activate wheel brakes, though they are small lever arms that you should look at before climbing in the seat.
More Up Than Down
With its wonderfully long glide and slow sink rate (about 200 fpm, which is far better than what most LSA can achieve), the Sinus is a flying machine meant to say up. And given its 81-horse Rotax 912, the climb rate is also excellent at about 1,200 to 1,300 fpm. Folks have asked Mudd about the 100-hp Rotax 912S, but such added power isn’t needed and might invite more problems than it solves, Mudd says. The fact remains that Pipistrel still sells the Sinus with a 50-hp Rotax 503 with which I’m told it flies quite well.
With the 81 horses pulling, takeoff roll is quite brief. The factory states it takes less than 300 feet and that matched my experience. Liftoff speed is low, with stall occurring at around 40 mph. The plane smoothly departs the surface and pitch control is reasonable throughout climb at the recommended 75 mph.
Powered cruise is quite brisk despite the very long wings. The Sinus can manage 134 mph, says the factory. In my flight we weren’t quite this fast, but Mudd was handling the prop control and perhaps it wasn’t optimized for the fastest cruise speed. Never exceed speed is 141 mph.
The prop control is much like a vernier throttle where movement of the large knurled knob finely adjusts the prop pitch. By holding a collar behind the knob you can move the control more coarsely to more swiftly put the blades into a fully feathered – or streamlined – position. You’ll want to rehearse this procedure in the 5 hours of instruction you’ll receive with the purchase of a Sinus.
In flying earlier ultralights, we commonly lead with the rudder and followed with the aileron, generally the opposite of a general aviation airplane. Slower flying ultralights of yesteryear were rudder-dominated flying machines. So are sailplanes and the Sinus is closer to a sailplane than short-wing, highly loaded airplanes. Given its 49-foot wingspan, you need to initiate yawing action before banking the wings into the turn. Using the rudder and easing in ailerons as needed accomplish this smoothly.
From the performance of such long wings, you’ll also need to use a little “high siding,” or use of opposite aileron to keep from overbanking. You may also need to use a bit of opposite rudder with the aileron.
Regardless of the technique, which will come quickly enough since you’ll be practicing a lot while trying to circle in thermals, those wings really do a job at holding up this 1,200 pound flying machine. This was really the part I loved. It wasn’t that I was immediately good at thermaling flight, but the Sinus will sustain altitude in almost any air and will rise readily when you find lift in a thermal. Listening to and watching the variometer as it recorded lifting or descending movements was exciting for an old soaring pilot like me. The beeps of lift were easily encouraged while the steady tone of sink told me I was slipping out of the main lift area.
I could circle for days refining this exquisite art of lift optimization. Soaring pilots know that no two thermals are identical and no two days produce identical thermals, so the mystery of thermal soaring flight is never fully understood nor mastered. This ever-changing medium is precisely what makes thermal soaring so fascinating. With practice, however, you can become very proficient with the technique and suddenly you’ll notice you’ve been flying for hours without the engine running. Excellent!
If you’re a stick wiggler who likes to maneuver, the Sinus motorglider ought to be in serious contention for your buying dollars. If you prefer to fly as fast as you can in the straightest possible line, then you need a completely different kind of airplane. When you soar the Sinus, your hands and feet are always doing something. It isn’t hard to fly; that isn’t the reason for the constant effort. To maximize lift like thermals means a series of circles flown with the greatest possible finesse and that means almost constantly moving the controls. I love this kind of flying, so I liked the Sinus. You might not care for this in the least but fortunately that doesn’t mean you’ll hate the Sinus. It only means you won’t be using it to its full potential.
With its great ability to optimize lift, perhaps you won’t be surprised to hear that the Sinus stalls mildly. Such designs are intended to be flown for long periods at just above stall (where thermal flying is commonly done).
The Sinus will stall, of course, but the action is quite unthreatening. I examined stalls in turns because you’ll be turning a lot in the Sinus while soaring. Accelerated stalls were very modest, the nose breaking forward and the wings returning to level, slowly, but steadily. It gave me confidence to bank the airplane steeply when trying to stay in – or “core” – thermals, knowing I was quite unlikely to fall steeply out of a stall
Catching a Sinus (the Aircraft)
The sales program for the Sinus in the USA is quite a bit different than many aircraft as the importer tries to provide some protection from America’s legal liability situation. Australian Michael Coates made a deal with Pipistrel owner Ivo Boscarol where the orders are handled through Coates via the down-under nation and the U.S.-based dealers receive direct shipment of the airplane.
As mentioned earlier, 5 hours of training goes with the purchase price as a safety incentive. You also get instructions on the Brauniger instrument and on in-air restarts. This is a worthy offer and one every buyer should plan to accept.
In late summer ’05, the price was stated at $76,000 though this fluctuates with exchange rates. If you go to the Pipistrel-USA Website, the dollar/euro pricing changes automatically and regularly to reflect the current exchange rate.
The $76,000 price is for a tailwheel model and no total energy compensation. The latter is something sailplane pilots understand and is a static source system that helps factor out “fake” lift from real lift. Fake lift can come from stick movements that use energy to ascend. Sailplane pilots call this a “stick thermal,” and it can deceive you from sensing genuine lift. Total energy compensation removes this effect from the variometer readout.
A nosewheel on the Sinus adds $1,700 but you might save that in insurance cost or generally be able to buy insurance. Obtaining insurance for taildraggers operations is much harder unless you already have a good amount of tailwheel experience.
The Sinus is manufactured in Slovenia, a country that does not have a bilateral agreement with the U.S. This fact, plus its in-flight adjustable- pitch prop, means the Sinus cannot currently qualify as a light-sport aircraft. That leaves a potential buyer with two options.
You can obtain the Sinus as a kit and that’s the best alternative for someone who wants to fly this aircraft over longer distances. The Sinus is already available as a kit, which the factory says will take 200 to 400 hours to complete. At present, U.S. dealer Robert Mudd is planning to build a Sinus from kit form to use in going through the process of obtaining FAA approval under the Amateur-built (51%) rule. Once added to the FAA’s list of approved aircraft, the process becomes realistic for customers.
The difference in the 200- or 400-hour time estimate deals with the two fuselage halves. The kit with the lower time has these halves assembled and finished by the factory where the 400-hour kit fuselage comes separately. Other than this more significant task, I understand that building a Sinus is merely an assembly job not so different than other kits.
Mudd says the Pipistrel kits tend to include everything you need, including the engine and prop, instruments, and all accessory items – all you’ll need to go flying is fuel in the tank.
The other option is to buy a Sinus as an Experimental aircraft in the Exhibition or Racing category, which is how the few presently flying in the U.S. are being flown. This will limit the buyer to flights within a 300-nautical-mile radius, which for many soaring enthusiasts may actually be sufficient.However, Mudd explains, you can submit a written list for a year in advance for places you want to go (airshows or contests, for example,) and then you can go as planned without having to ask for further permission. Should you choose to go to a location not on your original list, you submit an amendment, fax it to the appropriate FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) and you don’t need to wait for a reply. However, asking to take a fully built Sinus from California to Florida for a few days of flying probably won’t be approved. This method may work for some buyers but Mudd’s effort to gain kit approval will surely help him sell more of this impressive motorglider.
Putting a finer point on the acquisition, the 400-hour kit (fuselage not assembled) will cost about $66,000 depending on dollar/euro currency fluctuations. The finished fuselage 200-hour kit jumps $7,000 to $73,000 and a fully built tricycle gear Sinus was selling for $78,000 in August 2005. If you can be content with the Rotax 503, which I did not test but which supposedly has plenty of power, you can save more than $13,000.
For all the details of purchase, you’ll want to talk to Robert Mudd and he’ll have more answers after he completes his kit and requests FAA approval as an Amateur-built Experimental-class aircraft. But for pure flying pleasure, the Sinus is a fine choice in my experience. As a realistic and affordable motorglider, it’s one of the best aircraft I’ve had the opportunity to fly.
Dan Johnsonhas been flying for more than 30 years, logging nearly 5,000 hours in many types of aircraft from hang gliders and paragliders to ultralights, sailplanes and twin-engine general aviation aircraft. Dan is an FAA-rated commercial pilot and CFI whose focus these days is on ultralights and light-sport aircraft. He has flown and photographed more than 250 different models in a writing career spanning more than 25 years. Dan is the 1999 recipient of the USUA Moody Award, and the 2001 recipient of the “Spirit of Flight” Award sponsored by the Society of Experimental Test Pilots (SETP).
A large number of Dan’s pilot reports and other informational articles may be found at his Website: www.
|Empty weight||626 pounds|
|Wing area||132 square feet|
|Wing loading||6.1 pounds/square foot|
|Useful Load||574 pounds|
|Length||21 feet, 8 inches|
|Payload (with full fuel)||478 pounds|
|Height||5 feet, 7 inches|
|Fuel Capacity||16 gallon (24 gallon optional)|
|Baggage area||40 pounds|
|Kit type||Fully assembled or Kit|
|Build time||400 hours|
|Standard engine||Rotax 912 UL|
|Power loading||9.0 pounds/hp|
|Cruise speed||134 mph|
|Never exceed speed||140 mph|
|Rate of climb at gross||1,200 fpm|
|Takeoff distance at gross||288 feet|
|Landing distance at gross||400 feet|
|Notes:||Propeller: 2-blade, controllable pitch with full feathering.|
|Standard Features||81-hp Rotax 912 (as tested), electronic instrument with ASI, VSI, altimeter, water temp, EGT, CHT, tachometer, fuel gauge, auto hours logging, fully enclosed cabin with gull-wing doors, removable wings, in-flight trim, flaps, remote choke, shock-absorbing gear, steerable nosewheel, hydraulic brakes.|
|Options||50-hp Rotax 503, additional instruments, and ballistic parachute.|
|Construction||Composite airframe, wing, fuselage, and tail with steel components. Made in Slovenia; imported by Australian-owned company, distributed by U.S. business.|
Cosmetic appearance, structural integrity, achievement of design goals, effectiveness of aerodynamics, ergonomics.
Pros – Elegant design, especially the long, lovely, and shapely wings that extend to almost 50 feet of span. Efficient performer should satisfy most soaring pilots. All composite materials using extensive sailplane-building technologies. Well “tested” by an around-the-world flight. Tricycle or taildragger, kit or finished versions available.
Cons – The Sinus cannot presently qualify as a light-sport aircraft because it comes from a country without the required bilateral agreement with the U.S., and because of its in-flight adjustable prop. Design is so optimized to its soaring purpose that it may not satisfy those whose interest in soaring is only occasional.
Subsystems available to pilot such as: Flaps; Fuel sources; Electric start; In-air restart; Brakes; Engine controls; Navigations; Radio; (items covered may be optional).
Pros – Well designed aircraft with a plethora of systems: electric starting, in-flight trim, flaps including a reflex range, adjustable pitch to full feathering prop, airbrakes. Panel is an easy reach as are all controls regardless of which seat you occupy. Easy engine access under cowling.
Cons – At least one system, the adjustable prop, knocks the Sinus out of the LSA category yet without it, the soaring performance would suffer somewhat. Fuel on top of wing may require a boost for access for some folks (though another system for refueling is also available; ask dealer). No trim or flap indicator other than lever position.
Instrumentation; Ergonomics of controls; Creature comforts; (items covered may be optional).
Pros – Adequate panel space for most instruments, though the standard Brauniger Alpha multi-function display uses space well and leaves room for more gauges. Both sides of panel have a roomy compartment for maps and other items you need in flight. A 40-pound baggage area is provided aft of the seats. Adjustable rudder pedals.
Cons – Cabin structure with a spar and steel components barely over the head of average-sized pilots, and may be a significant problem for tall pilots. Maximum pilot height stated at 6 feet, 4 inches. If the emergency ballistic parachute system is ordered, much of the baggage space will be used for this purpose.
Taxi visibility; Steering; Turn radius; Shock absorption; Stance/Stability; Braking.
Pros – The Sinus comes with toe brakes in both positions. Rudder pedals adjust for comfort and optimal control. Excellent lateral visibility through large windows in gull-wing doors. Ground maneuvering aided by differential braking, adding to direct nosewheel linkage. Adequate ground clearance for turf field operations.
Cons – With nearly 50 feet of span and a swept-back wingtip, taxiing in crowded conditions can be worrisome; you can’t see the tips while seated. Turn radius also somewhat wide (though tighter than it appears). Forward visibility is limited by the high instrument panel, even in tricycle gear model.
Qualities; Efficiency; Ease; Comparative values.
Pros – Rotax 912 engine gives the Sinus more than adequate power, allowing takeoff in less than 300 feet (under 400 feet even with the Rotax 503). Landing visibility is good. Energy retention is, understandably, excellent. Making the landing field was never easier with Sinus’ 28-to-1 glide and low sink.
Cons – The long glide and low sink rate of the Sinus demand that you are familiar with using the airbrakes (they help a great deal). Landings will require a slightly longer strip than takeoff. Flaps tend not to add much drag, by design. Crosswind landings aren’t hard but watch those long wings.
Quality and quantity for: Coordination; Authority; Pressures; Response; and Coupling.
Pros – Controls felt nice and fluid at all speeds. Stick-and-rudder forces were modest yet offered feedback. No problem with precision turns. Harmony was surprisingly good for a sailplane-type aircraft (which are normally rudder dominated). Roll rate is a fairly snappy 4+ seconds for 45°-to-45° test.
Cons – Best to slightly lead with the rudder and follow with the ailerons, requiring relearning new techniques for most power pilots (though not sailplane or ultralight pilots). Adverse yaw is understandably significant given that the ailerons are far out from the fuselage. Steep turns require some high siding.
Climb; Glide; Sink; Cruise/stall/max speeds; Endurance; Range; Maneuverability.
Pros – Performance is one of the great strengths of this design; with a 28-to-1 glide angle (still 18-to-1 at 80 mph) and a sink rate of 200 fpm (the latter about what a modern hang glider achieves). Cruise is right at the upper end of the LSA parameters (134 mph), yet stall is low (40 mph). Fuel use at cruise is a low 3.5 gph. Climb is also strong at 1,200 fpm.
Cons – If you’re not looking for a long glide and a low sink rate, the Sinus may not be your next airplane. No other performance negatives.
Stall recovery and characteristics; Dampening; Spiral stability; Adverse yaw qualities.
Pros – In all stalls tested, recovery was very quick and the airplane’s response was benign. The Sinus can fly comfortably at just above stall (40 mph), no surprise since that’s where most thermal flying is done. Longitudinal stability was good. Pitch response to engine changes were normal.
Cons – Adverse yaw is rather significant due primarily to the aileron’s long distance from the fuselage. Slightly leading with the rudder is the right technique but pilots forgetting this fact will not have well- coordinated turns. No spins tested. No other negatives.
Addresses the questions: “Will a buyer get what he/she expects to buy, and did the designer/builder achieve the chosen goal?”
Pros – Former trike-building company made a clean-sheet design that most regard as very impressive looking; elegant and sleek. ‘Round-the- world flight proves abilities as does winning microlight championship. Rotax 503 model is modestly priced and said to perform well. Nearly 200 flying worldwide.
Cons – The Sinus is built in Slovenia, which has no U.S. bilateral agreement, meaning the Sinus cannot presently be a LSA. Must build from kit (200 to 400 hours; see article) or fly under Experimental/Exhibition (which may be okay if soaring is your only interest). Kit instructions not examined. Few flying in U.S. at present.
Abhishek Bhardwaj says
Hi. I am Abhishek Bhardwaj, motorglider instructor in India. Now flying sinus 912.
deric mcgee says
I’m in Chicago where can I see it & learn to fly it?
Dan Johnson says
Hi Deric: Please reach out to Pipistrel for such information. Good luck!